A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
refers to your landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Below’s a brief overview:
As a result of recent amendment, the court imposed a more severe sentence than would have been feasible under the previous Model in the legislation.
4. It's been noticed by this Court that there is often a delay of in the future while in the registration of FIR which has not been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness of the alleged incidence as well as prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession from the petitioners continues to be tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram occurred being the real brothers with the deceased but they didn't react in any way towards the confessional statements in the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, just one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not look much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation concerning why her arrest wasn't effected after making in the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on so many instances that extra judicial confession of the accused is often a weak form of evidence which may be manoeuvred from the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution can be counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word concerning presence of some light with the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners together on the motorcycle at 4.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Specified the legal analysis on the topic issue, we've been of the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally audio, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are subject matter to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case of your petitioners for promotion could be viewed as, however, we have been obvious within our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, subject to availability of vacancy topic for the approval in the competent authority.
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID required) to criminal case information in participating Circuit Courts with the purpose of confirming of an individual’s date of birth.
four. It goes without expressing that observations made hereinabove are only tentative in nature and strictly confined for the disposal of instantaneous bail petition.
The ruling in the first court created case regulation that must be accompanied by other courts until finally or Unless of course either new law is created, or even a higher court rules differently.
There are many circumstances where death was never intended – even more where All those nominated while in the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of a human being is usually a tragic event. Although the death of any living being is no considerably less a tragic event.
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners failed a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances from the more info case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
Please note, For anyone who is seeking a price exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, will be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It includes the execution of your convicted person for a consequence of their crime.
Regardless of its popularity, very few might be aware of its intricacies. This article is really an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section as well as the very small threshold that governs it.
Seek out websites affiliated with respected legal institutions or organizations. Validate the information against other sources when achievable.
Finding reliable free case law sites may be challenging. Many websites require subscriptions or offer limited information. This article helps you navigate the landscape of free case regulation resources in Pakistan, delivering you with a curated list of reliable and accessible platforms.